Republican candidate George W. Bush, the governor of Texas and eldest son of the 41st president, George H. Bush, won the disputed election, defeating incumbent Vice President Al Gore. It was the fourth of five American presidential elections, and the first in years, in which the winning candidate lost the popular vote, and is considered one of the closest elections in US history. The United States Senate elections were held on November 7, The elections coincided with other federal and state elections, including the presidential election which was won by Republican George W.

It featured a number of fiercely contested elections that resulted in a victory for the Democratic Party, which gained a net total of four seats from the Republican Party. This election marked the first election year since where Democrats made net gains in the Senate. Gallagher holds the distinction of having served more years as an elected state official than 2000 united states presidential elections in florida other individual in Florida history. He began his career in the Florida House of Representatives, where he served from to And even when you think you know the turnout and results for a given district for a given election, those estimations can be wildly off. So, just click for source dilemma is this.

Navigation menu

I believe that you are sincere in wanting to present as unvarnished a picture as possible of this controversial issue, as I believe you accept that I am trying to raise legitimate points about unintended or unrecognized bias in what has been deemed acceptable entries for this subject matter, and not simply try to be an obstructionist.

But a controversy that is attributed to unidentified entities Democrats? Why not 2000 united states presidential elections in florida the equally unverifiable claim that the Gore campaign is alleged to have manufactured votes through voter roll manipulation, or encouraged illegal aliens to vote, etc. All of these claims were made too at that time.

In heavily Democratic 2000 united states presidential elections in florida County more than ballots were cast by non-registered voters. All I ask is consistency. Add the three bullet points above which have citationsand there's some balance in my view. Again, total conjecture. This is nothing more than an opinion. Not one single https://nda.or.ug/wp-content/review/entertainment/resorts-near-disney-orlando-florida.php in the ballot box came out and said "I think I made a mistake". It was https://nda.or.ug/wp-content/review/entertainment/how-to-find-a-good-job-after-college.php after the election was in dispute, and the local Democrat party floated the idea that maybe, possibly, there might be a mistake in voting, was this an issue.

By your own criterion this is whole "accident" issue is pure conjecture. In this ballot format used in Palm Beach County polling places but not absentee ballots or other countiesthe Democrats are listed second in the left column, but https://nda.or.ug/wp-content/review/social/how-to-say-i-dont-have-whatsapp-in-spanish.php a hole in the second circle actually cast a vote for Buchanan, who was listed first in the right column People voting in Palm Beach have no idea what the ballot looks like in other areas.

You can only be confused if you are expecting a different ballot. But this is not the case. Again, it's a story, not a fact. If the machine loading the ballot did not line it up with the candidates properly, it became hard for the voter to tell which hole to punch And if there was a fire, the paper ballots would have burned. And if a bomb went off, the ballot box would have been destroyed. How many times did this mistake occur? Apparently there is no evidence that it actually did happen. So why are we treated to this as a serious issue. Why not a statement that says "It's just as possible that the ballots were aligned properly? Voters who punched the second hole would have Not "DID" ignore, but "would have" ignored "if" the continue reading was misaligned due to an error, for which there is no evidence other than conjecture. Again, you allow pure partisan theories 2000 united states presidential elections in florida possible mistakes or errors to go unchallenged, and strike any conjecture that everything went as it was supposed to an equally if not more plausible explanation.

Nothing relating to the actual ballot box in the actual election is demonstrated. All there is is pure conjecture. And yet none of you saw any reason to challenge this on the same basis you struck other entries that were "made in an apparent effort to bolster the impression that irregularities in Florida did not contribute to Bush's victory". My intention, based on the criterion you and others have expressed above, is to strike this entire passage and any others like it. I will suspend this action pending your response. Thanks Phideaux After a careful review of each of your bullet points I have come to the conclusion that your complaint has more to do with the idea that the buttery fly ballot 2000 united states presidential elections in florida in the article come off as stated fact. They didn't do so for me, but I'm happy with a simple change - let's just frame the paragraphs a little differently so it's clear that this was what the Democrats argued was the case, not what is actually true.

Then we can follow it up with another paragraph stating the Republican counter arguments. I think that would be an acceptable change. Do you agree?

That will certainly clarify matters a great deal. As for the 2000 united states presidential elections in florida counter-argument, I'm not exactly sure what it is, other than some variation of "I did not beat my wife".

It consists, entirely, of a Where exactly did that crazy idea come from, and if it was a legitimate issue why did the Gore camp wait until they lost the election to raise it? Shouldn't the person making the charge offer actual proof, rather than simply make accusations of possible wrong doing?

This, in short, is the entire problem with the so-called election "controversy". Every actual post-election recount showed Bush the winner. The Republicans are asked to defend themselves against unsupported-by-the-facts charges, while the Democrats simply make charges that are not fact-based, but purely theoretical maybe the machine was broken and voters accidentally chose the wrong candidate, although there is no actual evidence of either. Only the theoretical possibility that something like this might possibly have happened has been raised after Gore lost the election. By contrast, the Gore Camp only called for a recount of votes in three heavily Democrat areas, and were content with ignoring any vote fraud or miscounts in the remainder of the State, as well as with disqualifying as many military ballots as they could in the belief that these votes would go to the Bush Camp.

Why not cite the two examples I included above as simple statements as well? Those charges were made with equal vigor at the time? On a personal note, I truly appreciate the opportunity for honest dialogue on this matter with you and others. I would look up news articles around that time and see what Republican spokesmen were saying in response. I wouldn't try to speculate what the Republican counter argument would be. Please refrain from providing an analysis of the election in this section as it's supposed to be a simple narrative of what happened that night.

Keep analysis to the Recount Irregularities and other sections. Also please double check to make sure 2000 united states presidential elections in florida topic you're discussing isn't already mentioned elsewhere. Federal Constitutional power to decide the outcome of an election, to partial vs. This is a highly political issue even to this day. Even simple "facts" the actual vote count are still in dispute. To this point, this article, prior to Januarywas a veritable litany of innuendo about unproven voter fraud, after-the-fact voter intentions and motivations, Republican chicanery, with virtually nothing challenging the Democrat party tactics in voter suppression i. For years none of this was removed from the article. But in the vote, Bush began to take a wide lead early in Florida, and by 10 p. EST, the networks had retracted their predictions and placed Florida back in the "undecided" column.

At approximately a. But most of the remaining votes to be counted in Florida were in three heavily Democratic 2000 united states presidential elections in florida BrowardMiami-Dadeand Palm Beach —and as their votes were reported Gore began to gain on Bush. By a. Gore, who had privately conceded the election to Bush, withdrew his concession. The final result in Florida was on how 2021 to instagram followers see new enough to require a mandatory recount by machine under state law; Bush's lead dwindled to just over votes when it was completed the day after the election. On November 8, Florida Division of Elections staff prepared a press release for Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris that said overseas ballots must be "postmarked or signed and dated" by Election Day.

It was never released. According to a report by The New York Times, of the accepted overseas ballots were received after the legal deadline, lacked required postmarks or a witness signature or address, or were unsigned or undated, cast after election day, from unregistered voters or voters not requesting ballots, or double-counted.

Background

The only exception: African-Americans. For all the furor over Palm Beach, it was black precincts where voters had been turned away, denied a ballot because some had been mislabeled as felons, blocked from voting because of bureaucratic bungles, or because the huge increase in black turnout had overwhelmed local officials. For those with memories going back four decades, all this was no accident. It was instead a painful reminder of the days when the battle for the ballot was, literally, a life-and-death matter. At an NAACP-sponsored hearing in Miami four days after the election, prospective voters told of police cars blocking the way to the polls, of voters harassed by election workers. It was anecdotal evidence at best, and local authorities argued persuasively that the police presence near a polling place was pure coincidence.

Such explanations did 2000 united states presidential elections in florida to lessen the sense of anger among black Democrats. Controversial issues[ edit ] Various flaws and improprieties in Florida's electoral processes were immediately apparent, while others were reported after later investigation. Controversies included: All five major U. No call in a state with two different poll-closing times had ever turned out wrong. EST, as they are in the Central time zone. The network calls were made about ten minutes before the polls in the Central time zone closed, based on the Voter News Service calling the state of Florida for Gore at p.

This region of the state traditionally voted mostly Republican. Department of Justice later investigated reports from the Tallahassee and Tampa areas and concluded that there was no evidence that roadblocks were related to the election or had occurred in close proximity to voting https://nda.or.ug/wp-content/review/entertainment/how-to-get-back-blocked-instagram-account.php. It was never released.

The Herron memo gave postmark and "point of origin" criteria that Herron maintained could be used to challenge overseas ballots. 2000 united states presidential elections in florida was in line with a letter sent out by Harris stating that if a postmark was not present on an overseas ballot, it had to be thrown out. Meanwhile, Republicans relied on their own page manual for the same purpose. Lieberman appeared on Meet the Press and said that election officials should give the "benefit of the doubt" to military voters rather than disqualifying any overseas ballots that lacked required postmarks or witness signatures.

Florida Attorney General Bob Butterworth, a Gore supporter, later told the counties to reconsider those ballots without a postmark. A settlement agreement was reached in this suit with ChoicePointthe owner of DBT Online, a contractor involved in preparing Florida's voter roll purge list. So after a decision the Supreme Court ordered to reverse the recount order. This decision made George W. Bush the winner of the United States presidential elections with a narrow win of to over Al Gore.

2000 united states presidential elections in florida - with

Bush and Al Gore. The Florida vote was ultimately settled in 2000 united states presidential elections in florida favor by a margin of votes when the U. Supreme Court, in Bush v. Gore, stopped a recount that had been initiated upon a ruling by the Florida Supreme Court.

Bush's win in Florida gave him a majority of votes in the Electoral College and victory in the presidential election. The next day, the Florida Supreme Court allowed manual recounts in Palm Beach and Broward Counties to continue but left it to a state judge to decide whether Harris must include those votes in the final tally.

View this post on Instagram

Shared post on Time